#code review
Explore public prompts for code review. Narrow the topic by medium or change the order.
Showing 1–9 of 9 · Page 1 / 1
Codex Skills Mode: Installing Skill Packs and an Autonomous Implementation Loop (cc-sdd)
Uses cc-sdd's --codex-skills install to load reusable skills (SKILL.md) into Codex CLI on demand, and replicates its /kiro-impl autonomous execution loop — a fresh implementer per task, an independent reviewer, and automatic root-cause debugging on failure — so Codex advances steadily through a task list one task at a time.
wshobson's Flagship code-reviewer Subagent: A Senior Reviewer Inside Claude Code
Installs the flagship code-reviewer subagent from wshobson/agents (36k stars, MIT license) into Claude Code, giving you an Opus-powered senior reviewer specialized in security, performance, and maintainability that automatically takes over review after every commit.
Agent-Rules Pack: Conventional Commits + 6-Persona PR Review + 5 Whys Root-Cause Analysis
Curates three core project-rules from steipete/agent-rules into a single rule pack usable directly as a slash command: semantic commits (12 types plus emoji, with automatic splitting into atomic commits), a 6-persona professional PR review, and 5 Whys root-cause analysis.
Codex's Four-Gate Kickoff: Define the Task → Review the Plan → Check the Diff → Nothing Counts as Done Without Verification
Turns a vague requirement into a full Codex workflow: first force it to nail down a 'definition of done,' use plan mode to produce a plan for your approval, then implement in small steps, run its own tests, and finally produce a reviewable diff with verification evidence.
Codex Wrap-Up Officer: Turn Finished Changes into a Semantic Commit + a PR That Passes Review
Once your code changes are done, have Codex read the staged diff, produce a Conventional Commits message, and write a PR description covering background, what changed, why, how it was verified, and risks — without bundling in unrelated changes, exaggerating, or fabricating tests.
Codex Rigorous Diff Reviewer: Correctness, Simplification, and Security in Three Tracks
Has Codex do a disciplined code review of your git diff across three tracks (correctness bugs / simplification-and-reuse / security), listing each finding with a confidence level and a pastable fix, and explicitly instructed to say so when nothing's wrong instead of manufacturing complaints.
AI Code Review: Catch Bugs, Security Issues, and Readability Problems
Have AI review your code like a senior engineer: it flags concrete issues and fixes across four dimensions — correctness, security, performance, and readability — instead of vague praise.
Run an Architecture Review on Your Whole Codebase with Claude
Upload the repo and Claude returns an architectural map, the top 5 fixes to prioritize, and the file paths to back them up.
PRO09Claude Code Review Assistant: Quality Check Before Merging a PR
Not a casual 'take a quick look at this code' request. One command yields a full review of the PR across four dimensions: scope/impact, security, performance, and readability.