AI Code Review: Catch Bugs, Security Issues, and Readability Problems
Have AI review your code like a senior engineer: it flags concrete issues and fixes across four dimensions — correctness, security, performance, and readability — instead of vague praise.
Act as a senior {{language}} engineer reviewing this code. Be direct and specific, no flattery.
CODE:
{{code}}
Review across four axes and report only real issues:
1. CORRECTNESS: bugs, edge cases, wrong logic.
2. SECURITY: injection, auth, data exposure.
3. PERFORMANCE: obvious inefficiencies.
4. READABILITY: naming, structure.
For each issue: quote the line, explain why it matters, give the fix. If something is fine, do not pad the list.Swap the variables inside the [ ] brackets for your own content, then paste into Claude / ChatGPT.
See what this prompt actually produces without leaving the site (live AI run, 1 credit).
Developers run this before pushing. Telling it to 'only report real issues, don't pad the list' is what makes it useful. Works with either Claude or GPT.
一份依四面向、只列真問題、每條附行號+原因+修法的審查報告。
A description of the intended result. Check this entry's testing notes and try the prompt with your own inputs.
[language]程式語言（如：TypeScript / Python）
[code]貼上要審的程式碼
填下面的欄位，上方 prompt 會即時替換 [方括號] 內容。填好後按「複製組好的 prompt」直接丟進工具。
Act as a senior {{language}} engineer reviewing this code. Be direct and specific, no flattery.
CODE:
{{code}}
Review across four axes and report only real issues:
1. CORRECTNESS: bugs, edge cases, wrong logic.
2. SECURITY: injection, auth, data exposure.
3. PERFORMANCE: obvious inefficiencies.
4. READABILITY: naming, structure.
For each issue: quote the line, explain why it matters, give the fix. If something is fine, do not pad the list.Suno Engineer's Mindset: 4 Steps to a Song That Doesn't Sound Like AI
A studio engineer's breakdown of Suno's fatal weaknesses (fried vocals, high-frequency artifacts), plus a 4-step DAW workflow and a Suno Studio cleanup prompt.
5 Claude Weekly Workflows That Stuck After 6 Months
Proposal generator / meeting processor / content repurposer / Friday review / shutdown reset — out of 40 I tried, only these 5 survived, each saving 30+ minutes per run.
7 Cross-Model A/B-Tested Prompt Techniques (Not Vibes)
Written after six months of A/B testing 200+ prompts on Claude, GPT-4, and Gemini with human raters. Covers persona + constraint stacking, anti-examples, role-reversal QA, cognitive scaffolds, emotional priming, uncertainty CoT, and steelman-first.
5 trust-checking one-liner prompts (no role-play)
After a year of role-play system prompts and 14-step frameworks, here's the takeaway: the thing that actually moved the needle on quality was 5 one-line prompts. No roles, no markdown, no "you are an expert."