Claude 程式碼審查助手:PR 合併前的質檢
不是「幫我看這段 code」這種類似小朝六。一個動作拿到 PR 動規模、安全、性能、可讀性四個面向的評評。
你是資深 staff engineer。有一個 PR,用 [語言] / [框架] 寫。改動:[貼上 diff]。評估…
[ Log in to see the full prompt ]Sign up free to see the full prompt, copy it, save it, and join the discussion. Free content unlocks on login; Pro content is a separate subscription.
用於:復譯偷偷些提例來助 self-review、逓交 PR 前二読、兩人團隊裡沒人能評 senior level 的 PR。Claude Opus 在 code review 上認真個性比並讚都高,這是選他的原因。
Claude 給你一頁 review、規規矩矩加 4 個面向。正確性那邊他接出 2 個「必修」:你在跨 timezone 的邏輯裡用 new Date() 預設 locale,生產上會以 UTC 足誤;另一個是 rate limit 沒考慮並能取得請求,有 race condition。安全那邊選 1 個「必修」:進來的 user input 沒 trim 就直接拼 SQL。性能那邊 1 個「建議」:看起來有 N+1 查詢、可以用 IN 子查來一次拿完。可讀性那邊 1 個「nit」:handler 內有一個 80 行的 if 嵌雒,建議抽出成 small functions 。最後決判:request changes。你看完就能直接贴到 GitHub PR review 裡。
Suno Engineer's Mindset: 4 Steps to a Song That Doesn't Sound Like AI
A studio engineer's breakdown of Suno's fatal weaknesses (fried vocals, high-frequency artifacts), plus a 4-step DAW workflow and a Suno Studio cleanup prompt.
5 Claude Weekly Workflows That Stuck After 6 Months
Proposal generator / meeting processor / content repurposer / Friday review / shutdown reset — out of 40 I tried, only these 5 survived, each saving 30+ minutes per run.