Claude Code Review Assistant: Quality Check Before Merging a PR
Not a casual 'take a quick look at this code' request. One command yields a full review of the PR across four dimensions: scope/impact, security, performance, and readability.
你是資深 staff engineer。有一個 PR，用 [語言] / [框架] 寫。改動：[貼上 diff]。評估…
[ Log in to see the full prompt ]Sign up free to see the full prompt, copy it, save it, and join the discussion. Free content unlocks on login; Pro content is a separate subscription.
Use cases: helping with self-review before submitting, a second read-through before submitting a PR, or a two-person team where nobody else can review at a senior level. Claude Opus is notably more thorough and diligent at code review than other models—that's the reason to pick it for this.
Claude 給你一頁 review、規規矩矩加 4 個面向。正確性那邊他接出 2 個「必修」：你在跨 timezone 的邏輯裡用 new Date() 預設 locale，生產上會以 UTC 足誤；另一個是 rate limit 沒考慮並能取得請求，有 race condition。安全那邊選 1 個「必修」：進來的 user input 沒 trim 就直接拼 SQL。性能那邊 1 個「建議」：看起來有 N+1 查詢、可以用 IN 子查來一次拿完。可讀性那邊 1 個「nit」：handler 內有一個 80 行的 if 嵌雒，建議抽出成 small functions 。最後決判：request changes。你看完就能直接贴到 GitHub PR review 裡。
Suno Engineer's Mindset: 4 Steps to a Song That Doesn't Sound Like AI
A studio engineer's breakdown of Suno's fatal weaknesses (fried vocals, high-frequency artifacts), plus a 4-step DAW workflow and a Suno Studio cleanup prompt.
5 Claude Weekly Workflows That Stuck After 6 Months
Proposal generator / meeting processor / content repurposer / Friday review / shutdown reset — out of 40 I tried, only these 5 survived, each saving 30+ minutes per run.