Run an Architecture Review on Your Whole Codebase with Claude
Upload the repo and Claude returns an architectural map, the top 5 fixes to prioritize, and the file paths to back them up.
Review my codebase ({{tech_stack}}) and produce architectural map + top 5 improvements with file:line citations
[ Log in to see the full prompt ]Sign up free to see the full prompt, copy it, save it, and join the discussion. Free content unlocks on login; Pro content is a separate subscription.
Claude 4.5's architectural reasoning over large codebases is something GPT-5 and Gemini can't match — especially its honesty tokens like "I'm not sure, I'd need to see file X." Engineering teams use this for quarterly architecture reviews at roughly 1/10,000th the cost of a consultant.
3 段式輸出：架構地圖 / Top 5 改善（含 file:line + code + 工時 + 風險）/ 不要動的 2-3 件事
A description of the intended result. Check this entry's testing notes and try the prompt with your own inputs.
Suno Engineer's Mindset: 4 Steps to a Song That Doesn't Sound Like AI
A studio engineer's breakdown of Suno's fatal weaknesses (fried vocals, high-frequency artifacts), plus a 4-step DAW workflow and a Suno Studio cleanup prompt.
5 Claude Weekly Workflows That Stuck After 6 Months
Proposal generator / meeting processor / content repurposer / Friday review / shutdown reset — out of 40 I tried, only these 5 survived, each saving 30+ minutes per run.
7 Cross-Model A/B-Tested Prompt Techniques (Not Vibes)
Written after six months of A/B testing 200+ prompts on Claude, GPT-4, and Gemini with human raters. Covers persona + constraint stacking, anti-examples, role-reversal QA, cognitive scaffolds, emotional priming, uncertainty CoT, and steelman-first.
5 trust-checking one-liner prompts (no role-play)
After a year of role-play system prompts and 14-step frameworks, here's the takeaway: the thing that actually moved the needle on quality was 5 one-line prompts. No roles, no markdown, no "you are an expert."