Turn Any Material into a Study Pack: Flashcards, Quiz, Outline
Feed in a textbook chapter, lecture notes, or meeting materials, and get three items generated at once: flashcards to help you memorize, a self-quiz to test yourself, and a speaking outline to help you explain it out loud. Good for certification exam prep, study-group facilitation, and new-hire training. It has a built-in anti-fabrication rule that says "organize only from the provided material"; for long material, feed it in batches and generate one pack per batch, then merge — that's the most reliable approach.
【用途】把我提供的資料整理成一份「研究包」、讓我可以直接拿去準備考試、讀書會導讀或教別人。 【我的背景】 - 學習目標：[學習目標] - 目前程度：[目前程度] - 可用準備時間：[準備時間] 【資料】 [資料內容] 【輸出三件套】 一、重點卡（10 到 15 張） - 每張格式：正面＝一個概念或名詞；背面＝三句以內的白話解釋＋一個具體例子 - 依「最常考／最容易混淆」排序；最容易搞混的概念要成對出現、並標出兩者差異 二、自測題（10 題） - 混合單選題與簡答題、由淺到深 - 每題附答案、以及「答錯這題代表你沒吃透哪張重點卡」的對應編號 三、口述大綱 - 假設我要在讀書會用 10 分鐘講完這份資料 - 給我：開場一句話、三到五個主要段落（每段附關鍵詞與一句轉場）、結尾一句總結 - 標出「聽眾最可能發問的 2 個問題」與建議回答方向 【鐵律】 - 只根據我提供的資料整理、不要補充資料以外的知識；資料沒涵蓋的主題、直接寫「資料未涵蓋」 - 白話優先：所有解釋要講給[目前程度]的人聽得懂 - 全部用繁體中文與台灣用語
Swap the variables inside the [ ] brackets for your own content, then paste into ChatGPT / Claude / Gemini.
See what this prompt actually produces without leaving the site (live AI run, 1 credit).
The three items map to three stages of learning: flashcards handle input and memorization, the self-quiz handles retrieval practice, and the speaking outline handles output — being able to explain something out loud is what proves you actually understand it. "Organize only from the provided material" is the key anti-fabrication phrase — without it, the model will automatically supplement with outside knowledge and mix in content from unclear sources. Limitation: material that's too long will exceed what can be processed in one pass — it's best to do one chapter per batch, generate one pack each, and then have it merge them; flashcards may still slip in examples not from the source material, so spot-checking a few cards against the original text before an exam is the safest move.
[學習目標]例：兩週後考多益金色證書／下週讀書會要導讀這一章
[目前程度]例：完全新手、只看過一次課本／已讀過兩遍但觀念會混
[準備時間]例：每天 1 小時、共 10 天
[資料內容]例：貼上課本章節、講義、筆記或會議紀錄全文；太長可分批貼、每批各生一包再合併
填下面的欄位，上方 prompt 會即時替換 [方括號] 內容。填好後按「複製組好的 prompt」直接丟進工具。
【用途】把我提供的資料整理成一份「研究包」、讓我可以直接拿去準備考試、讀書會導讀或教別人。 【我的背景】 - 學習目標：[學習目標] - 目前程度：[目前程度] - 可用準備時間：[準備時間] 【資料】 [資料內容] 【輸出三件套】 一、重點卡（10 到 15 張） - 每張格式：正面＝一個概念或名詞；背面＝三句以內的白話解釋＋一個具體例子 - 依「最常考／最容易混淆」排序；最容易搞混的概念要成對出現、並標出兩者差異 二、自測題（10 題） - 混合單選題與簡答題、由淺到深 - 每題附答案、以及「答錯這題代表你沒吃透哪張重點卡」的對應編號 三、口述大綱 - 假設我要在讀書會用 10 分鐘講完這份資料 - 給我：開場一句話、三到五個主要段落（每段附關鍵詞與一句轉場）、結尾一句總結 - 標出「聽眾最可能發問的 2 個問題」與建議回答方向 【鐵律】 - 只根據我提供的資料整理、不要補充資料以外的知識；資料沒涵蓋的主題、直接寫「資料未涵蓋」 - 白話優先：所有解釋要講給[目前程度]的人聽得懂 - 全部用繁體中文與台灣用語
Suno Engineer's Mindset: 4 Steps to a Song That Doesn't Sound Like AI
A studio engineer's breakdown of Suno's fatal weaknesses (fried vocals, high-frequency artifacts), plus a 4-step DAW workflow and a Suno Studio cleanup prompt.
5 Claude Weekly Workflows That Stuck After 6 Months
Proposal generator / meeting processor / content repurposer / Friday review / shutdown reset — out of 40 I tried, only these 5 survived, each saving 30+ minutes per run.
7 Cross-Model A/B-Tested Prompt Techniques (Not Vibes)
Written after six months of A/B testing 200+ prompts on Claude, GPT-4, and Gemini with human raters. Covers persona + constraint stacking, anti-examples, role-reversal QA, cognitive scaffolds, emotional priming, uncertainty CoT, and steelman-first.
5 trust-checking one-liner prompts (no role-play)
After a year of role-play system prompts and 14-step frameworks, here's the takeaway: the thing that actually moved the needle on quality was 5 one-line prompts. No roles, no markdown, no "you are an expert."