Contract Red-Flag Scan: Risky Clauses in Leases, Jobs, and Outsourcing
Feed in a lease, employment, or outsourcing contract, and it scans clause by clause from your side of the deal: a plain-language translation, worst-case scenario, risk grading, and negotiation angle for each, plus three questions to bring to a professional at the end. Note: this is a prep tool for understanding a contract, not legal advice — for high-value contracts or ones involving major rights, consult a lawyer, and it's safest to treat the scan results as homework to do before meeting one.
【用途】幫我掃描這份合約、把對我不利的條款用白話標出來。你不是律師、這不是法律意見；目的是讓我知道哪些條款該特別注意、之後該問誰。 【合約類型】[合約類型] 【我的角色】[我的角色] 【我最在意的事】[最在意的事] 【合約全文】 [合約全文] 【掃描輸出格式】 逐條掃描、只回報有疑慮的條款、每條用以下格式： - 🚩 條款位置：第幾條、並一字不差引用關鍵句 - 白話翻譯：這條實際上在說什麼、講給完全沒有法律背景的人聽 - 對我的風險：最壞情況下我會發生什麼事 - 風險等級：【高】明顯偏向對方、可能造成實質損失／【中】不對等但市場上常見／【低】留意即可 - 可以怎麼談：實務上常見的修改方向與措辭建議 【掃描重點（依合約類型加重檢查）】 - 共通：違約金與賠償上限、單方解約權、自動續約、管轄法院、保密與競業範圍 - 租約：押金返還條件、修繕責任歸屬、提前解約罰則、租金調漲機制 - 勞動：工時與加班費、離職預告、競業禁止有無補償、智慧財產歸屬 - 外包：驗收標準是否明確、付款節點、修改次數有無上限、著作權歸屬與轉讓範圍 【鐵律】 - 引用原文必須一字不差、不准改寫後當成原文 - 沒問題的條款不必逐條報告、最後一句總結即可 - 結尾附「建議帶去問專業人士的 3 個問題」 - 最後必須提醒：本掃描非法律意見、重大權益或高金額合約請諮詢律師
Swap the variables inside the [ ] brackets for your own content, then paste into ChatGPT / Claude / Gemini.
See what this prompt actually produces without leaving the site (live AI run, 1 credit).
The baseline up front: this helps you understand a contract and flags what to ask about — it is not legal advice; for high-value contracts or ones touching major rights, consult a lawyer. The key to making it effective is "specifying a role" — without it, the model splits the difference between both sides; once you specify that you're the tenant or the contractor, it will actually look for red flags from your side. "Quote the original text verbatim" makes it easy to cross-check, and prevents distortion from paraphrasing. Limitation: the model may miss clauses buried in attachments or provisos, and its memory of current Taiwan regulatory details may be outdated; it's safest to treat the output as a "prep checklist before seeing a lawyer."
[合約類型]例：房屋租賃合約／勞動契約／接案外包合約
[我的角色]例：我是承租人／我是受僱者／我是接案方
[最在意的事]例：提前解約會不會被罰、押金拿不拿得回來
[合約全文]例：貼上合約全文、含附件與但書；太長可分批貼、並註明「共 X 段的第 X 段」
填下面的欄位，上方 prompt 會即時替換 [方括號] 內容。填好後按「複製組好的 prompt」直接丟進工具。
【用途】幫我掃描這份合約、把對我不利的條款用白話標出來。你不是律師、這不是法律意見；目的是讓我知道哪些條款該特別注意、之後該問誰。 【合約類型】[合約類型] 【我的角色】[我的角色] 【我最在意的事】[最在意的事] 【合約全文】 [合約全文] 【掃描輸出格式】 逐條掃描、只回報有疑慮的條款、每條用以下格式： - 🚩 條款位置：第幾條、並一字不差引用關鍵句 - 白話翻譯：這條實際上在說什麼、講給完全沒有法律背景的人聽 - 對我的風險：最壞情況下我會發生什麼事 - 風險等級：【高】明顯偏向對方、可能造成實質損失／【中】不對等但市場上常見／【低】留意即可 - 可以怎麼談：實務上常見的修改方向與措辭建議 【掃描重點（依合約類型加重檢查）】 - 共通：違約金與賠償上限、單方解約權、自動續約、管轄法院、保密與競業範圍 - 租約：押金返還條件、修繕責任歸屬、提前解約罰則、租金調漲機制 - 勞動：工時與加班費、離職預告、競業禁止有無補償、智慧財產歸屬 - 外包：驗收標準是否明確、付款節點、修改次數有無上限、著作權歸屬與轉讓範圍 【鐵律】 - 引用原文必須一字不差、不准改寫後當成原文 - 沒問題的條款不必逐條報告、最後一句總結即可 - 結尾附「建議帶去問專業人士的 3 個問題」 - 最後必須提醒：本掃描非法律意見、重大權益或高金額合約請諮詢律師
Suno Engineer's Mindset: 4 Steps to a Song That Doesn't Sound Like AI
A studio engineer's breakdown of Suno's fatal weaknesses (fried vocals, high-frequency artifacts), plus a 4-step DAW workflow and a Suno Studio cleanup prompt.
5 Claude Weekly Workflows That Stuck After 6 Months
Proposal generator / meeting processor / content repurposer / Friday review / shutdown reset — out of 40 I tried, only these 5 survived, each saving 30+ minutes per run.
7 Cross-Model A/B-Tested Prompt Techniques (Not Vibes)
Written after six months of A/B testing 200+ prompts on Claude, GPT-4, and Gemini with human raters. Covers persona + constraint stacking, anti-examples, role-reversal QA, cognitive scaffolds, emotional priming, uncertainty CoT, and steelman-first.
5 trust-checking one-liner prompts (no role-play)
After a year of role-play system prompts and 14-step frameworks, here's the takeaway: the thing that actually moved the needle on quality was 5 one-line prompts. No roles, no markdown, no "you are an expert."