ChatGPT Lesson Plan Generator: Topic to Script for Corporate Training
When you're assigned to run training or onboard new hires, the time-consuming part isn't knowing the content — it's arranging it into an order you can actually teach. This prompt uses the basic instructional-design framework (objectives, motivation hook, explanation, practice, assessment) to produce a complete lesson plan, including time allocation, interaction design, and points where learners tend to get stuck. Works for corporate training, new-hire onboarding, and club/community teaching.
你是一位企業內訓課程設計師，受過教學設計訓練，擅長把專業內容轉成「學員真的學得會」的課程，而不是單向簡報。 課程主題：[課程主題]。學員背景：[學員是誰與程度]。課程時長：[時長]。上完課學員要能做到：[預期學習成果]。 請產出一份完整教案，格式如下： **1. 學習目標**（2-3 條，全部用「學員能夠＋可觀察的動詞」寫，例如「能獨立完成退款流程」，禁用「了解」「認識」這種無法檢核的詞） **2. 課程結構表**（表格：時間段｜環節名稱｜內容重點｜教學方式｜所需教材。教學方式至少包含一次互動或練習，不能整堂都是講述） **3. 逐段教學腳本**：每個環節寫出—— - 開場引導語（實際可以照唸的 2-3 句話） - 核心內容要點（條列） - 學員最可能卡住或誤解的點，以及怎麼接 - 銜接到下一段的轉場句 **4. 練習與檢核設計**：至少一個課中練習（含題目與參考答案）＋一個課後檢核方式（怎麼知道學員真的會了） **5. 講師備忘**：時間不夠時哪段可以砍、學員程度比預期差時怎麼調整 品質準則：時間分配要留 10% 緩衝，不能排滿；練習題要跟學習目標直接對應；如果我的主題在這個時長內教不完，先告訴我建議砍掉什麼，再產出教案。
Swap the variables inside the [ ] brackets for your own content, then paste into ChatGPT.
See what this prompt actually produces without leaving the site (live AI run, 1 credit).
For when your company asks you to "just quickly" put together some training, onboard a new hire, or share domain expertise with your department. Most people's mistake with internal training is treating a slide deck as a lesson plan — you finish talking, but learners still can't actually do the thing. This prompt forces the inclusion of observable learning objectives and practice checks, making it a simplified version of instructional design (in the style of ADDIE/Gagné). The "section-by-section script including a verbatim opening line" is especially useful for people who don't present often. One caveat: you still need to verify the accuracy of any expert content the AI generates yourself — it handles the instructional structure, but the final check on subject-matter accuracy is still on you.
[課程主題]例如：新人客服系統操作、部門報價流程教學
[學員是誰與程度]例如：8 位剛到職一週的新人，完全沒碰過這套系統
[時長]例如：90 分鐘、半天（3 小時）
[預期學習成果]例如：能獨立完成一筆完整訂單處理，不需要老手在旁邊
填下面的欄位，上方 prompt 會即時替換 [方括號] 內容。填好後按「複製組好的 prompt」直接丟進工具。
你是一位企業內訓課程設計師，受過教學設計訓練，擅長把專業內容轉成「學員真的學得會」的課程，而不是單向簡報。 課程主題：[課程主題]。學員背景：[學員是誰與程度]。課程時長：[時長]。上完課學員要能做到：[預期學習成果]。 請產出一份完整教案，格式如下： **1. 學習目標**（2-3 條，全部用「學員能夠＋可觀察的動詞」寫，例如「能獨立完成退款流程」，禁用「了解」「認識」這種無法檢核的詞） **2. 課程結構表**（表格：時間段｜環節名稱｜內容重點｜教學方式｜所需教材。教學方式至少包含一次互動或練習，不能整堂都是講述） **3. 逐段教學腳本**：每個環節寫出—— - 開場引導語（實際可以照唸的 2-3 句話） - 核心內容要點（條列） - 學員最可能卡住或誤解的點，以及怎麼接 - 銜接到下一段的轉場句 **4. 練習與檢核設計**：至少一個課中練習（含題目與參考答案）＋一個課後檢核方式（怎麼知道學員真的會了） **5. 講師備忘**：時間不夠時哪段可以砍、學員程度比預期差時怎麼調整 品質準則：時間分配要留 10% 緩衝，不能排滿；練習題要跟學習目標直接對應；如果我的主題在這個時長內教不完，先告訴我建議砍掉什麼，再產出教案。
Suno Engineer's Mindset: 4 Steps to a Song That Doesn't Sound Like AI
A studio engineer's breakdown of Suno's fatal weaknesses (fried vocals, high-frequency artifacts), plus a 4-step DAW workflow and a Suno Studio cleanup prompt.
5 Claude Weekly Workflows That Stuck After 6 Months
Proposal generator / meeting processor / content repurposer / Friday review / shutdown reset — out of 40 I tried, only these 5 survived, each saving 30+ minutes per run.
7 Cross-Model A/B-Tested Prompt Techniques (Not Vibes)
Written after six months of A/B testing 200+ prompts on Claude, GPT-4, and Gemini with human raters. Covers persona + constraint stacking, anti-examples, role-reversal QA, cognitive scaffolds, emotional priming, uncertainty CoT, and steelman-first.
5 trust-checking one-liner prompts (no role-play)
After a year of role-play system prompts and 14-step frameworks, here's the takeaway: the thing that actually moved the needle on quality was 5 one-line prompts. No roles, no markdown, no "you are an expert."