Self-Critique Revision Loop: Draft, Self-Criticize, Revise — Three Rounds of Polish in One Prompt
Has the AI produce a first draft, then switch into a strict editor role to pick apart its own flaws, and finally rewrite based on that critique — effectively running three rounds of polish inside a single prompt.
Task: {{task}}
Do all three in one response:
1. DRAFT: write a first version.
2. CRITIQUE: switch to a harsh expert reviewer. List the 3 biggest weaknesses of the draft, be specific, no flattery.
3. REVISE: rewrite the draft fixing every critique.
Return only the final revised version plus a one-line note on what you changed.Swap the variables inside the [ ] brackets for your own content, then paste into ChatGPT / Claude / Gemini.
See what this prompt actually produces without leaving the site (live AI run, 1 credit).
Too lazy to go back and forth revising it yourself? This has the AI act as its own editor, catch its own flaws, and fix them — so you get a polished version in one pass. Works well for copywriting, emails, and reports.
最終改寫版 + 一行「改了什麼」說明（中間草稿與批評不顯示）。
[task]要產出的內容任務
填下面的欄位，上方 prompt 會即時替換 [方括號] 內容。填好後按「複製組好的 prompt」直接丟進工具。
Task: {{task}}
Do all three in one response:
1. DRAFT: write a first version.
2. CRITIQUE: switch to a harsh expert reviewer. List the 3 biggest weaknesses of the draft, be specific, no flattery.
3. REVISE: rewrite the draft fixing every critique.
Return only the final revised version plus a one-line note on what you changed.Suno Engineer's Mindset: 4 Steps to a Song That Doesn't Sound Like AI
A studio engineer's breakdown of Suno's fatal weaknesses (fried vocals, high-frequency artifacts), plus a 4-step DAW workflow and a Suno Studio cleanup prompt.
5 Claude Weekly Workflows That Stuck After 6 Months
Proposal generator / meeting processor / content repurposer / Friday review / shutdown reset — out of 40 I tried, only these 5 survived, each saving 30+ minutes per run.