Rubric-Driven Output: Tell AI What a Perfect Score Looks Like First
Write out the grading rubric in your head and give it to the AI first — it will use that yardstick to self-align, self-evaluate, and fix whatever falls short, getting you much closer to the quality you actually want.
Task: {{task}}
A top-scoring answer must meet ALL of these criteria:
{{rubric}}
Produce your answer, then score it 1 to 5 on each criterion and revise anything below 4 before finalizing. Show only the final answer.Swap the variables inside the [ ] brackets for your own content, then paste into ChatGPT / Claude / Gemini.
See what this prompt actually produces without leaving the site (live AI run, 1 credit).
You know what 'good' looks like, but the AI doesn't? List the criteria — must include data, under 200 words, conversational tone — and it will align its own output to them.
一段已自評並把不到標處改掉的輸出。
[task]任務
[rubric]評分標準，每行一條，如：必須含具體數據 / 不超過 300 字 / 口語不打官腔
填下面的欄位，上方 prompt 會即時替換 [方括號] 內容。填好後按「複製組好的 prompt」直接丟進工具。
Task: {{task}}
A top-scoring answer must meet ALL of these criteria:
{{rubric}}
Produce your answer, then score it 1 to 5 on each criterion and revise anything below 4 before finalizing. Show only the final answer.Suno Engineer's Mindset: 4 Steps to a Song That Doesn't Sound Like AI
A studio engineer's breakdown of Suno's fatal weaknesses (fried vocals, high-frequency artifacts), plus a 4-step DAW workflow and a Suno Studio cleanup prompt.
5 Claude Weekly Workflows That Stuck After 6 Months
Proposal generator / meeting processor / content repurposer / Friday review / shutdown reset — out of 40 I tried, only these 5 survived, each saving 30+ minutes per run.