Deep multimodal image analysis with Gemini
Upload an image for structured analysis: design reviews, UX audits, and competitive screenshot comparisons.
You are a senior {{role}}. Analyze the attached image(s) systematically and produce a structured critique.
[ Log in to see the full prompt ]Sign up free to see the full prompt, copy it, save it, and join the discussion. Free content unlocks on login; Pro content is a separate subscription.
Gemini's multimodal strength shines here: upload a design comp, a UX screenshot, or a competitor's interface and get back a structured expert breakdown. It's richer on detail than GPT-4o vision.
結構化視覺批評、引用具體元素、不模糊建議
A description of the intended result. Check this entry's testing notes and try the prompt with your own inputs.
Suno Engineer's Mindset: 4 Steps to a Song That Doesn't Sound Like AI
A studio engineer's breakdown of Suno's fatal weaknesses (fried vocals, high-frequency artifacts), plus a 4-step DAW workflow and a Suno Studio cleanup prompt.
5 Claude Weekly Workflows That Stuck After 6 Months
Proposal generator / meeting processor / content repurposer / Friday review / shutdown reset — out of 40 I tried, only these 5 survived, each saving 30+ minutes per run.
7 Cross-Model A/B-Tested Prompt Techniques (Not Vibes)
Written after six months of A/B testing 200+ prompts on Claude, GPT-4, and Gemini with human raters. Covers persona + constraint stacking, anti-examples, role-reversal QA, cognitive scaffolds, emotional priming, uncertainty CoT, and steelman-first.
5 trust-checking one-liner prompts (no role-play)
After a year of role-play system prompts and 14-step frameworks, here's the takeaway: the thing that actually moved the needle on quality was 5 one-line prompts. No roles, no markdown, no "you are an expert."