Skip to content
←INDEX / Prompt library
TUTORIAL/Gemini 2.5 Pro/Beginner

Auto-generate action items from meeting recordings and video with Gemini

Upload a 60-minute meeting recording and Gemini surfaces every action item, owner, and timestamp.

SakuyaPromptCraft editor · Updated 2026-05-14
TutorialGemini 2.5 ProBeginner
01PROMPT
You are an executive assistant analyzing a {{duration}}-minute meeting recording I've uploaded. The meeting was about: {{topic}}.

Produce:

## 1. Action items (table)
| Owner | Action | Deadline | Quote | Timestamp |

Only include items where someone clearly committed (not vague "we should..."). If a deadline wasn't mentioned, write "—". Quote should be 5-15 words verbatim. Timestamp in mm:ss.

## 2. Decisions made (bullets)
Things explicitly agreed on during the meeting (different from action items — these are conclusions, not next steps).

## 3. Open questions / unresolved (bullets)
Things discussed but not resolved. These usually need follow-up.

## 4. Vibe check (1 sentence)
Was the meeting productive / contentious / focused / wandering? Honest assessment.

Rules: don't invent names. If you're unsure who said something, write "unclear speaker". Don't paraphrase quotes — copy verbatim.

Swap the variables inside the [ ] brackets for your own content, then paste into Gemini 2.5 Pro.

◆ Open in toolGemini (paste it)
RUNTRY IT
▶ TRY IT ON-SITE

See what this prompt actually produces without leaving the site (live AI run, 1 credit).

02CONTEXT / Why it works

Manually writing up meeting notes after a PM or leadership meeting is low-ROI work. Gemini ingests the recording directly and returns action items (with cited timestamps) plus a vibe check.

03SAMPLE / Expected result

4 段:action items table / decisions / open questions / vibe check,全有 timestamp 引言

A description of the intended result. Check this entry's testing notes and try the prompt with your own inputs.

04VARIABLES
01[duration]

會議長度(30 / 60 / 90 / 120 分鐘)

02[topic]

會議主題(如:Q2 product roadmap review / customer escalation triage / engineering planning)

05RESOLVER · 變數代入器0 / 2

填下面的欄位,上方 prompt 會即時替換 [方括號] 內容。填好後按「複製組好的 prompt」直接丟進工具。

修飾
Assembled · 填剩餘變數…
You are an executive assistant analyzing a {{duration}}-minute meeting recording I've uploaded. The meeting was about: {{topic}}.

Produce:

## 1. Action items (table)
| Owner | Action | Deadline | Quote | Timestamp |

Only include items where someone clearly committed (not vague "we should..."). If a deadline wasn't mentioned, write "—". Quote should be 5-15 words verbatim. Timestamp in mm:ss.

## 2. Decisions made (bullets)
Things explicitly agreed on during the meeting (different from action items — these are conclusions, not next steps).

## 3. Open questions / unresolved (bullets)
Things discussed but not resolved. These usually need follow-up.

## 4. Vibe check (1 sentence)
Was the meeting productive / contentious / focused / wandering? Honest assessment.

Rules: don't invent names. If you're unsure who said something, write "unclear speaker". Don't paraphrase quotes — copy verbatim.
RELATED
PRO01
TUTORIALSuno v5.5FEATURED
r/SunoAI (anonymous studio engineer)2026-06-12

Suno Engineer's Mindset: 4 Steps to a Song That Doesn't Sound Like AI

5.0(1)

A studio engineer's breakdown of Suno's fatal weaknesses (fried vocals, high-frequency artifacts), plus a 4-step DAW workflow and a Suno Studio cleanup prompt.

Advanced
Read

Free02
TUTORIALClaude 4.5 SonnetFEATURED
r/ClaudeAI2026-05-14

5 Claude Weekly Workflows That Stuck After 6 Months

Proposal generator / meeting processor / content repurposer / Friday review / shutdown reset — out of 40 I tried, only these 5 survived, each saving 30+ minutes per run.

Intermediate
Read

PRO03
TUTORIALClaude 4.5 SonnetFEATURED
r/PromptEngineering2026-05-14

7 Cross-Model A/B-Tested Prompt Techniques (Not Vibes)

Written after six months of A/B testing 200+ prompts on Claude, GPT-4, and Gemini with human raters. Covers persona + constraint stacking, anti-examples, role-reversal QA, cognitive scaffolds, emotional priming, uncertainty CoT, and steelman-first.

Advanced
Read

Free04
TUTORIALChatGPTFEATURED
r/ChatGPTPromptGenius2026-05-14

5 trust-checking one-liner prompts (no role-play)

After a year of role-play system prompts and 14-step frameworks, here's the takeaway: the thing that actually moved the needle on quality was 5 one-line prompts. No roles, no markdown, no "you are an expert."

Beginner
Read

COMMENTS · 討論區0 則
登入 後可留言。還沒帳號?註冊
目前沒有留言。第一個說說你的經驗。