Claude · OpenAI GPT · Gemini
Long-form Article and Report Writing.
An evidence-based report from the same source pack
All three examples share the same article brief and source rules. Supply accessible material before drafting in sections. No source pack is attached here, and no model output has been evaluated.
Content reviewed
Shared brief
Research AI image generation in indie-game art workflows from 2023 to 2026. Inventory sources and gaps, approve an outline, then draft toward a 5,000-word English report with traceable citations.
Claude
Official version reference checked · Fable 5.1 / Opus 5.5 / Sonnet 5.5 / Haiku 5.5 · Source checked
Writing approach
Define the goal, available evidence and permitted edit scope.
English prompt example
Using only the source material supplied in this conversation, prepare a research article about how AI image generation affected indie-game art workflows between 2023 and 2026. First list the sources you can actually access, identify gaps and propose an outline. Wait for outline approval before drafting sections toward a 5,000-word target. Distinguish documented facts from interpretation. Cite the source and relevant passage for each factual claim. Do not invent game examples, prices, adoption statistics or references. If the source pack is missing, request it instead of claiming to have read attachments. Output Markdown headings, an evidence table and unresolved questions.Setup and use
Supply the material through your actual Claude interface or developer tool. A web conversation and an agent with repository access have different permissions.
Watch for
- Confirm the environment can actually read the needed files.
- Ask for execution evidence; tests that were not run must not be reported as passing.
OpenAI GPT
Official version reference checked · GPT-6 Astra / GPT-6.1 Sol / GPT-6 Luna · Source checked
Writing approach
State the supplied material, output format and how missing evidence should be handled.
English prompt example
Using only the source material supplied in this conversation, prepare a research article about how AI image generation affected indie-game art workflows between 2023 and 2026. First list the sources you can actually access, identify gaps and propose an outline. Wait for outline approval before drafting sections toward a 5,000-word target. Distinguish documented facts from interpretation. Cite the source and relevant passage for each factual claim. Do not invent game examples, prices, adoption statistics or references. If the source pack is missing, request it instead of claiming to have read attachments. Output Markdown headings, an evidence table and unresolved questions.Setup and use
Choose available models and tools in your OpenAI product. An API model listing does not establish access to the same model or features in a ChatGPT account.
Watch for
- Do not treat missing attachments or sources as already read.
- A text response does not prove that searches, file edits or tests occurred.
Gemini
Official version reference checked · 3.8 Flash / 3.5 Flash-Lite · Source checked
Writing approach
Inventory the supplied material, state its visible scope and request evidence-based analysis.
English prompt example
Using only the source material supplied in this conversation, prepare a research article about how AI image generation affected indie-game art workflows between 2023 and 2026. First list the sources you can actually access, identify gaps and propose an outline. Wait for outline approval before drafting sections toward a 5,000-word target. Distinguish documented facts from interpretation. Cite the source and relevant passage for each factual claim. Do not invent game examples, prices, adoption statistics or references. If the source pack is missing, request it instead of claiming to have read attachments. Output Markdown headings, an evidence table and unresolved questions.Setup and use
Check the input and model limits of your interface and supply necessary material in batches. Do not assume an entire repository was uploaded or read.
Watch for
- An input-size limit does not establish accurate use of every fact.
- Verify citations and proposed edits individually.
Copying does not submit a generation. Check the model, mode and available features on your target platform first.
Check the actual result
- Every number and example can be traced to a supplied source.
- Facts, interpretations and missing evidence are distinguished.
- Sections follow the outline; actual word count and citations have been checked.
Choosing and checking
Source coverage, traceable citations and a workable revision process help you choose a workflow. Compare actual drafts using the same sources and criteria rather than an untested ranking.