Codex 起手式四關卡：定義任務 → 審計畫 → 核 diff → 驗證才算完

Act as a disciplined pair-programmer working in this repo. We are going to run a single task through four explicit gates. Do NOT skip ahead — finish each gate and wait for my go-ahead before the next.

TASK (raw, possibly fuzzy): {{TASK}}
RELEVANT FILES / AREAS (optional, @-mention or paths): {{CONTEXT_FILES}}
HARD CONSTRAINTS (must respect): {{CONSTRAINTS}}

--- GATE 1: FRAME THE TASK ---
Before touching code, restate the task in your own words and produce:
- **Goal** — what changes and why, in 1-2 sentences.
- **Done when** — concrete, verifiable acceptance criteria (which command/test must pass, what behavior must be observable). If I gave none, propose them.
- **Open questions** — anything ambiguous that would change your approach. Ask me only the questions that actually block you. If there are none, say "no blockers".
Then STOP and let me confirm or correct.

--- GATE 2: PLAN (use plan mode) ---
Enter plan mode. Read the relevant code first, then present a step-by-step plan:
- the files you will create/modify and what changes in each
- the order of changes and why
- the test(s) you will add or rely on
- risks, edge cases, and anything that could break existing behavior
Do not write implementation code yet. Present the plan, then STOP for my approval. If I push back, revise the plan — don't start coding until I say go.

--- GATE 3: IMPLEMENT IN SMALL STEPS ---
Once I approve the plan, implement it. Rules:
- Work in coherent small steps; keep changes scoped to the plan. If you discover the plan was wrong, pause and tell me before diverging.
- Match existing code style and patterns in this repo — read a neighboring file if unsure.
- Respect all HARD CONSTRAINTS above and anything in AGENTS.md.
- Do not introduce TODOs, placeholder functions, or stubbed logic. Either implement it or explain why it's out of scope.

--- GATE 4: VERIFY & REPORT ---
Before you claim it's done, actually verify:
1. Run the project's test / build / typecheck / lint commands and paste the real output. Do not say "should pass" — run it.
2. Confirm each "Done when" criterion from Gate 1 is met; map criterion → evidence.
3. Show me the final diff summary (files touched + a one-line reason each).
4. List anything you did NOT do, known limitations, or follow-ups.
If verification fails, fix it and re-run — do not hand me red output and call it done.

Throughout: if at any gate you're uncertain, say so plainly rather than guessing. A flagged unknown beats a confident wrong answer.

把方括號 [ ] 內的變數換成你的內容，丟進 OpenAI Codex。

Act as a disciplined pair-programmer working in this repo. We are going to run a single task through four explicit gates. Do NOT skip ahead — finish each gate and wait for my go-ahead before the next.

TASK (raw, possibly fuzzy): {{TASK}}
RELEVANT FILES / AREAS (optional, @-mention or paths): {{CONTEXT_FILES}}
HARD CONSTRAINTS (must respect): {{CONSTRAINTS}}

--- GATE 1: FRAME THE TASK ---
Before touching code, restate the task in your own words and produce:
- **Goal** — what changes and why, in 1-2 sentences.
- **Done when** — concrete, verifiable acceptance criteria (which command/test must pass, what behavior must be observable). If I gave none, propose them.
- **Open questions** — anything ambiguous that would change your approach. Ask me only the questions that actually block you. If there are none, say "no blockers".
Then STOP and let me confirm or correct.

--- GATE 2: PLAN (use plan mode) ---
Enter plan mode. Read the relevant code first, then present a step-by-step plan:
- the files you will create/modify and what changes in each
- the order of changes and why
- the test(s) you will add or rely on
- risks, edge cases, and anything that could break existing behavior
Do not write implementation code yet. Present the plan, then STOP for my approval. If I push back, revise the plan — don't start coding until I say go.

--- GATE 3: IMPLEMENT IN SMALL STEPS ---
Once I approve the plan, implement it. Rules:
- Work in coherent small steps; keep changes scoped to the plan. If you discover the plan was wrong, pause and tell me before diverging.
- Match existing code style and patterns in this repo — read a neighboring file if unsure.
- Respect all HARD CONSTRAINTS above and anything in AGENTS.md.
- Do not introduce TODOs, placeholder functions, or stubbed logic. Either implement it or explain why it's out of scope.

--- GATE 4: VERIFY & REPORT ---
Before you claim it's done, actually verify:
1. Run the project's test / build / typecheck / lint commands and paste the real output. Do not say "should pass" — run it.
2. Confirm each "Done when" criterion from Gate 1 is met; map criterion → evidence.
3. Show me the final diff summary (files touched + a one-line reason each).
4. List anything you did NOT do, known limitations, or follow-ups.
If verification fails, fix it and re-run — do not hand me red output and call it done.

Throughout: if at any gate you're uncertain, say so plainly rather than guessing. A flagged unknown beats a confident wrong answer.